![]() |
GUI WORLD OF CULTURE |
WORLD OF FENG SHUI |
on Feng Shui |
on Feng Shui |
Article FS09/apr1 | ![]() |
Introduction An unfortunate feature in Feng Shui and astrology is the many different warring schools with conflicting thoughts. There is a tendency for practitioners to fail to examine the basis of what they learnt. The schools have no objective criteria to evaluate their theories and hence are unable to convince each other. When people resort to mystical explanations they can come out with all sorts of nonsense. We should seek objective criteria through scientific research to recover the original scientific basis of Feng Shui and astrology. The good news is that Feng Shui and astrology have scientific basis and can be scientifically statistically proven. Skeptics are out of date! I have reservations about Mei Hua (Plum Blossom) divination for many years - there are significant errors in it. It is time to discuss the fallacies of Mei Hua, and at the same time help practitioners adopt a more logical and objective approach in Feng Shui and astrology. The discussion will be in parts through separate articles (links to other articles provided at bottom of web page):
Methodology The Mei Hua divination interprets hexagrams supposedly based on the I Ching. Let us have a look at the conventional methodologies. In Mei Hua divination, there are a number of ways to get the hexagram for divination. Two methods are given below, vis (after Jou 1984 p.89,91):
Like in other Feng Shui and astrology arts, there are variants in the methodology of Mei Hua. |
|
The I Ching Perspectives Hexagrams are core parameters also of arts like Xuan Kong Da Gua, etc, all claiming that they adopt the I Ching. Feng Shui and astrology practitioners revere King Wen I Ching as the fountain source of all Chinese wisdom. The pertinent question is whether the schools properly and scientifically use the I Ching. Many have a semblance of the I Ching but are not necessarily adopting the principles of the I Ching. The conflicts indicate that the schools can easily misinterpret and misapply the hexagrams and misconstrue the meanings of the I Ching. A good understanding of the I Ching is necessary, if anyone wants to expose fallacies of the modern Mei Hua divination. Most readers unfortunately have not read in depth the I Ching. But, nevertheless, I will try my best to provide pertinent evaluations.
Many features of the I Ching like the trigrams, Five Elements, hexagrams are described in Confucius' King Wen I Ching. Does the Mei Hua divination really adopt the I Ching? |
|
|
|
1. Hu Kua, Moving Yao, Shih Kua not from I Ching. Many do not study the King Wen I Ching, but rely on pretenders who claim to know well the I Ching. When I first saw Shao Yung's Mei Hua divination more than 20 years ago I realised that both the methodology and Shao Yung's philosophy behind the methodology contradict the I Ching. The one great mistake of Shao Yung was his failure to realise that Confucius interpreted the hexagrams in terms of trigrams akin to the Pen Kua. Confucius never used the inner Yaos to form Hu Kua or "Moving Yao" to form Shih Kua. The modern Mei Hua divination creates Hu Kua through use of the internal 2-3-4 and then 5-4-3 Yaos. These additional trigrams are all rubbish, not supported by the writings of Confucius. The manipulation of the "Moving Yaos" to create additional trigrams in Shih Kua is a serious misunderstanding of Duke Chou's 6 Yaos. Duke Chou's 6 Yaos compose a sequence of linked progressive strategic events from Yao 1 up to Yao 6 for each hexagram. The 6 Yaos meanings compose a single unit to elaborate on the parent hexagram - they are not meant to be taken apart and changed though the false "Moving Yao" technique.
There are no older documentation of the I Ching other than those of Confucius. There are no other way the writings of Confucius interpret the hexagrams. So, from where do modern Mei Hua get their Hu Ku, Shih Kua and Ti-Yung rubbish? From God or the devil? |
|
2. Dates Formats Violate Wu Xing Principles Like other Feng Shui and astrology arts, Mei Hua suffers from the problematic choice of dating the year, month, day and hour. Let us look at an anecdote about Shao Yung (after Jou 1984):
Mei Hua people will just naively swallow the tale and exclaim how wonderful was Shao Yung! But, can you spot the flaw in the anecdote? Simple - it is inconceivable that the neighbour, having a garden, did not have a hoe or axe! The tale is cooked up! The narrator also forgot that, during the Sung dynasty, hours were computed according to a double hour format. There was no such thing as hour 22! I am aware that there is a version correcting the hour to fit the 12 double hours! This just shows the fabrications in the Mei Hua anecdotes. Now, what year, month, day or hour should be used? They say you can use any format of dates prevailing in the region. The Chinese would use their Ba Zi calendar system, the Western their Western calendar. Some Chinese even mix their Chinese dates with Western dates, and so on. The Mei Hua people claim that is okay as Mei Hua is an "intuition" method. So, it seems hard to offer a scientific rebuttal as they insist that it is all an "intuition" approach. Hmm, hmm.... In reality, such Mei Hua people do not understand what is meant by "intuition." The Chinese would put bamboo sticks in a container to shake out one stick. These sticks have numbers or titles attached. The person would also throw two pieces of wood to confirm that the stick was a divine choice. He would then go to the temple attendant who would pick the note meant for title denoted by the stick. Different temples have excerpts from different texts. They may use the I Ching hexagrams or the Romance of the Three Kingdoms tales. The selected note indicates the fortune.
Coming back to a more rational evaluation of the dating. The Mei Hua people claim that they take from the I Ching. They use many meanings of the King Wen I Ching hexagrams. However, the flow of the hexagrams are linked with seasonal factors. I agree with analysts who have associated the transition from Hexagram 1 Qian to Hexagram 2 Kun as the Summer Solstice. It has been shown that the bigua or sovereign hexagrams (01-43-34-11-19-24 and 02-23-20-12-33-44) follow the moon cycles. The King Wen I Ching hexagrams have a proper link with the sequence of actual astronomical movements or Time. Moreover, Wu Xing, also used in Mei Hua, is a major I Ching principle. But, the Wu Xing of Time are connected with Ba Zi or Four Pillars sequences of Time denoted in the Chinese calendar. The use of Western calendar, unless properly converted, will not be able to pick out the correct Wu Xing to apply in the divination.
If Mei Hua wants to claim that it is based on the I Ching, it has to adopt the I Ching astronomical Time format and its Wu Xing principle. As it is, many Mei Hua people simply use any format they like, based on so-called "intuition." (sic). At one moment they claim to use the I Ching. At another moment they said they do not have to. It is rather arbitrary.
Contradiction of Shao Yung "Eight Elements" with Wu Xing It has to be pointed out that although Shao Yung's Mei Hua divination refers to much of the Wu Xing meanings in the hexagrams of the King Wen I Ching, Shao Yung's cosmology does not have the Wu Xing:
Shao Yung did not refer to the Wu Xing but went direct to the "Eight Elements", which seem to replace the traditional eight trigrams. Where did Shao Yung get his "Eight Elements"? The associations of the Sun, stars, zodiacal spaces and Moon to some of the "Eight Elements" are not found in the I Ching and are also illogical in Chinese astrological arts.
Evidently, Shao Yung borrowed from Hindu sources. He had mixed up parts of the Great Ultimate concepts of King Wen I Ching with contradicting Hindu concepts. Shao Yung had taken pieces of concepts from various sources and combined them into what is a muddled patchwork cosmology. That is why the Mei Hua divination is inconsistent, with people sometimes using the Wu Xing and sometimes they do not. |
|
Conclusions
The lack of the Hu Kua, Shih Kua and Moving Yao techniques in the writings of Confucius is enough to condemn the modern Mei Hua claim that it is based on the I Ching. It selects arbitrarily what it wants to use of the I Ching and reject other I Ching indices, like its so-called "intuition dates". That is why Chu Xi, the greatest of the Confucian philosophers, stated that Shao Yung's work is not based on the I Ching:
Cheng Yi, the master of the lineage of Chu Xi, rejected Shao Yung's numerical philosophy as something not in line with the I Ching:
Chu Xi also pointed out a serious illogicality in the well-known Shao Yung's ring of 64 hexagrams. This will be discussed later in the fourth article. The leading Confucianists of his time would not agree with Shao Yung. Shao Yung's understanding of the I Ching is highly defective. The modern Mei Hua has only a semblance of the I Ching. Its claim to be based on the I Ching is basically a fraud, which can unfortunately fool the many who hardly read the I Ching. See the next article - you will learn that there was a more original Mei Hua... and that the Shao Yung's version could well be a clever forgery. |
|
Selected References:
Other related articles:
|
|